Minimum Specs
- mcallegari
- Posts: 4827
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:09 am
- Location: Italy
- Real Name: Massimo Callegari
- Contact:
QLC+ can be used for a wide variety of usages.
If you tell us what you need to do, then we can suggest which hardware you will need.
If you tell us what you need to do, then we can suggest which hardware you will need.
- mcallegari
- Posts: 4827
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:09 am
- Location: Italy
- Real Name: Massimo Callegari
- Contact:
Yeah but how many universes ?
Do you need to play audio/video ?
Do you use external controllers (MIDI, OSC, etc..) ?
I would say a standard setup could be:
- a fairly recent Mac (those based on Intel CPU)
- a USB DMX Pro adapter (DMXKing, Enttec, etc)
Do you need to play audio/video ?
Do you use external controllers (MIDI, OSC, etc..) ?
I would say a standard setup could be:
- a fairly recent Mac (those based on Intel CPU)
- a USB DMX Pro adapter (DMXKing, Enttec, etc)
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:39 pm
- Real Name: Matt Weber
In my experience the performance is most dependent on the DMX interface. QLC+ is not resource intensive but smooth updates to DMX output (during crossfades, etc.) is more a function of the quality of the interface. I have a couple of cheap enttec clones and an Enttec pro Mk2. There is a noticeable difference in the update speeds and smoothness of the fades when using the pro mk2 over the cheap clones.
Of course, I am not doing audio or video from QLC so YMMV if using those capabilities. I have a separate system dedicated to audio/video. I have managed to integrate them using OSC which is very cool.
Of course, I am not doing audio or video from QLC so YMMV if using those capabilities. I have a separate system dedicated to audio/video. I have managed to integrate them using OSC which is very cool.