Sequences and Shows – some observations and suggestions
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:59 pm
Hi everyone,
As a newly converted enthusiast for Sequences, I would firstly like to draw attention to some limitations in the usefulness of sequences and suggest some improvements.
Show Manager
a) When a sequence is deleted from a track, it cannot be recovered later, although it is still shown and can be tested in the function manager.
b) Although sequences can be created in the Function Manager, they cannot subsequently be added to a Show track. (In fact, is there anyway of replaying these Sequences other with the test facility in the Sequence Editor?)
c) The new sequence button should, if possible, open a list which includes all the Sequences bound to the current Scene, plus the option of creating a new Sequence.
d) The graphical representation on the Show track does not change as it should when the fade in / out / hold times are changed if they are set to “common”.
Sequences as Functions
e) It's rather a pity that a Sequence can't be attached directly to a button or Chaser step or included in a Collection, although setting up Show tracks and the attaching Shows to buttons or Chaser steps or including them in Collections is not a lot of extra work.
An important advantages of direct attachment would be that users could very easily discover what a time saver the Sequence Editor can be without having to learn to use the Show Manager. (This does not mean to imply that Shows are anything but a very valuable part of qlc+.)
f) I think the fade out time of a sequence step should follow its own fade out time as set, not the fade in time of the next step as at present. (Also applies to chaser steps)
Secondly, some issues with the documentation for Sequences and Shows:
Explanations missing from the documentation
For Sequences:
1) When a new step is created, it is inserted after the highlighted step as a copy of that step.
2) You need to click on the new step to highlight it in order to edit it. (It would probably be better if the new step were automatically highlighted when it was created.)
3) You need to click away from all the steps in the sequence so that none are highlighted before testing the sequence because otherwise the highlighted step remains on (i.e. its values are sent to DMX output) throughout the test.
4) Double click on an item to enter a new value or to add a note. (This is not documented in the chaser editor either.)
For the Show Editor:
5) The Show Editor is opened in the Functions Manager by clicking on the name of a Show. (It's not obvious where to find it!)
Terminology
It's probably too late to change anything now, but I would have instinctively named the Sequence a “chase” and the Chaser a “(cue) stack” - but maybe American usage is different.
It may possibly have helped to avoid the misunderstandings that have previously arisen regarding attaching a chaser to a cue list to control the all the lighting for a theatrical production.
As a newly converted enthusiast for Sequences, I would firstly like to draw attention to some limitations in the usefulness of sequences and suggest some improvements.
Show Manager
a) When a sequence is deleted from a track, it cannot be recovered later, although it is still shown and can be tested in the function manager.
b) Although sequences can be created in the Function Manager, they cannot subsequently be added to a Show track. (In fact, is there anyway of replaying these Sequences other with the test facility in the Sequence Editor?)
c) The new sequence button should, if possible, open a list which includes all the Sequences bound to the current Scene, plus the option of creating a new Sequence.
d) The graphical representation on the Show track does not change as it should when the fade in / out / hold times are changed if they are set to “common”.
Sequences as Functions
e) It's rather a pity that a Sequence can't be attached directly to a button or Chaser step or included in a Collection, although setting up Show tracks and the attaching Shows to buttons or Chaser steps or including them in Collections is not a lot of extra work.
An important advantages of direct attachment would be that users could very easily discover what a time saver the Sequence Editor can be without having to learn to use the Show Manager. (This does not mean to imply that Shows are anything but a very valuable part of qlc+.)
f) I think the fade out time of a sequence step should follow its own fade out time as set, not the fade in time of the next step as at present. (Also applies to chaser steps)
Secondly, some issues with the documentation for Sequences and Shows:
Explanations missing from the documentation
For Sequences:
1) When a new step is created, it is inserted after the highlighted step as a copy of that step.
2) You need to click on the new step to highlight it in order to edit it. (It would probably be better if the new step were automatically highlighted when it was created.)
3) You need to click away from all the steps in the sequence so that none are highlighted before testing the sequence because otherwise the highlighted step remains on (i.e. its values are sent to DMX output) throughout the test.
4) Double click on an item to enter a new value or to add a note. (This is not documented in the chaser editor either.)
For the Show Editor:
5) The Show Editor is opened in the Functions Manager by clicking on the name of a Show. (It's not obvious where to find it!)
Terminology
It's probably too late to change anything now, but I would have instinctively named the Sequence a “chase” and the Chaser a “(cue) stack” - but maybe American usage is different.
It may possibly have helped to avoid the misunderstandings that have previously arisen regarding attaching a chaser to a cue list to control the all the lighting for a theatrical production.