Clay Paky Stage Color 300

Here you can share your fixture definitions with the community
Post Reply
RODOLFO

This is the old fixture but is good.
Clay Paky Stage Color 300

go to the end of post
Massimo Callegari

Added, thanks.

Fixed:
- wrong product name. It's "Stage Color 300 AE"
- CMY channels description (you named them all "Mix")
- Strobe channel name (it's "Stopper/Strobe" and not "Shutter")
- Strobe channel "open" range. It's 0-25 and not 0-0
- wrong/missing modes (it's "Option Stnd", "Option 16 b" and "Option Extn" and not "8 bit" and "16 bit")
- wrong lamp. It's "HTI 300W" and not "HMI 1200 lamp"
- wrong color temperature and lumens
- power consumption and weight missing
- pan range wrong (it's 360° and not 450°)

Rodolfo, please follow what's written in the manuals !
Do not invent things.
Massimo Callegari

I just double checked.

You took the D4 definition from the Avolite personalities database and didn't even check if it was correct, cause I found the same mistakes.

I told you before, **THIS IS ILLEGAL**.
At least be smart and change a few things !

If you keep posting fixtures that you haven't created, I will not accept other definitions from you.
RODOLFO

Sorry for this fixture I have not had time to finish it. But understand that some manual is not correct. Should I remind you that the following fixtures are not correct: "Martin RoboColor 400, RG 400 Laser World, DNA slim pro ect ..." That is why I ask if it was possible to have a number version of Fixtures.Stage Color 300 is an old fixture. And its accompanying manual is a revision of this FIXTURE. Should I go with my speech by video? I would have the time to do it?
Massimo Callegari

Rodolfo, I feel fooled by you and the more this discussion continues, the more unpleasant I can become.

> Sorry for this fixture I have not had time to finish it.

This is not a fixture that you've created. You took a file covered by copyrights and didn't even check if it was correct. If you haven't had time to "finish" it you shouldn't have posted it.
I don't have time either to review bad fixtures definitions. I am following a million of other things and I would appreciate if fixtures posted here don't take us more than 5 minutes to be reviewed.

> But understand that some manual is not correct.

Don't blame the manual. I suspect you haven't even checked it.

> Should I remind you that the following fixtures are not correct: "Martin RoboColor 400, RG 400 Laser World, DNA slim pro ect ..."

Then fix them if you think they are wrong ! Don't even try to point the finger at us. At least we take the responsibility for what we do.

> That is why I ask if it was possible to have a number version of Fixtures

Non sense to me

> Stage Color 300 is an old fixture.

So ? Does it deserve a crappy definition then ?

> Should I go with my speech by video?

Please don't
RODOLFO

I am not to annoy you, but look at this.
Attachments
IMG_20150330_143256.jpg
IMG_20150330_143256.jpg (3.99 KiB) Viewed 1341 times
IMG_20150330_143322.jpg
IMG_20150330_143322.jpg (79.54 KiB) Viewed 1341 times
Massimo Callegari

I understand, but that's not the fixture of this thread (cause of CMY/RGB channels difference)

I think there are 3 models:
- the one in your pictures
- this one: http://www.claypaky.it/media/documents/ ... ure_EN.pdf
- the AE revision
http://www.claypaky.it/media/documents/ ... -06%29.pdf

All with the same name.
So if you want, you can submit the fixture(s) for the old model (I would say 2 separate fixtures)
RODOLFO

Update Stage Color 300 Model C61011

http://www.claypaky.it/media/documents/ ... ure_FR.pdf
Attachments
Clay%20Paky-Stage%20Color%20300.qxf
(3.15 KiB) Downloaded 202 times
Post Reply