Did we agree somewhere on how to indicate that a fixture has RDM capabilities?
For now, I just put '(RDM)' in the fixture definition header...
Fixture definition RDM capapbility
-
mcallegari
- Posts: 4711
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:09 am
- Location: Italy
- Real Name: Massimo Callegari
- Contact:
I think for QLC+ is irrelevant to know if a fixture is capable of RDM or not, for the simple reason that it will be discovered (or not) during RDM discovery.
If it's to "collect" information in the definition then it's another story, but it would be like including the user manual URL, which again is irrelevant for QLC+.
So my view is: please don't
If it's to "collect" information in the definition then it's another story, but it would be like including the user manual URL, which again is irrelevant for QLC+.
So my view is: please don't
-
GGGss
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 7:15 pm
- Location: Belgium
- Real Name: Fredje Gallon
Agreed,
And the capabilities reported through RDM is all but standardized - so this won't help at all, to collect for a fixture definition.
(I had to have to let riggers lower huge bridges because of a stupid not reported firmware version through RDM)
And the capabilities reported through RDM is all but standardized - so this won't help at all, to collect for a fixture definition.
(I had to have to let riggers lower huge bridges because of a stupid not reported firmware version through RDM)
All electric machines work on smoke... when the smoke escapes... they don't work anymore