Clay Paky Stage Color 300

[RODOLFO]

This is the old fixture but is good.
Clay Paky Stage Color 300

go to the end of post

[Massimo Callegari]

Added, thanks.

Fixed:
- wrong product name. It's "Stage Color 300 AE"
- CMY channels description (you named them all "Mix")
- Strobe channel name (it's "Stopper/Strobe" and not "Shutter")
- Strobe channel "open" range. It's 0-25 and not 0-0
- wrong/missing modes (it's "Option Stnd", "Option 16 b" and "Option Extn" and not "8 bit" and "16 bit")
- wrong lamp. It's "HTI 300W" and not "HMI 1200 lamp"
- wrong color temperature and lumens
- power consumption and weight missing
- pan range wrong (it's 360° and not 450°)

Rodolfo, please follow what's written in the manuals !
Do not invent things.

[Massimo Callegari]

I just double checked.

You took the D4 definition from the Avolite personalities database and didn't even check if it was correct, cause I found the same mistakes.

I told you before, **THIS IS ILLEGAL**.
At least be smart and change a few things !

If you keep posting fixtures that you haven't created, I will not accept other definitions from you.

[RODOLFO]

Sorry for this fixture I have not had time to finish it. But understand that some manual is not correct. Should I remind you that the following fixtures are not correct: "Martin RoboColor 400, RG 400 Laser World, DNA slim pro ect ..." That is why I ask if it was possible to have a number version of Fixtures.Stage Color 300 is an old fixture. And its accompanying manual is a revision of this FIXTURE. Should I go with my speech by video? I would have the time to do it?

[Massimo Callegari]

Rodolfo, I feel fooled by you and the more this discussion continues, the more unpleasant I can become.

> Sorry for this fixture I have not had time to finish it.

This is not a fixture that you've created. You took a file covered by copyrights and didn't even check if it was correct. If you haven't had time to "finish" it you shouldn't have posted it.
I don't have time either to review bad fixtures definitions. I am following a million of other things and I would appreciate if fixtures posted here don't take us more than 5 minutes to be reviewed.

> But understand that some manual is not correct.

Don't blame the manual. I suspect you haven't even checked it.

> Should I remind you that the following fixtures are not correct: "Martin RoboColor 400, RG 400 Laser World, DNA slim pro ect ..."

Then fix them if you think they are wrong ! Don't even try to point the finger at us. At least we take the responsibility for what we do.

> That is why I ask if it was possible to have a number version of Fixtures

Non sense to me

> Stage Color 300 is an old fixture.

So ? Does it deserve a crappy definition then ?

> Should I go with my speech by video?

Please don't

[RODOLFO]

I am not to annoy you, but look at this.

[Massimo Callegari]

I understand, but that's not the fixture of this thread (cause of CMY/RGB channels difference)

I think there are 3 models:
- the one in your pictures
- this one: http://www.claypaky.it/media/documents/ ... ure_EN.pdf
- the AE revision
http://www.claypaky.it/media/documents/ ... -06%29.pdf

All with the same name.
So if you want, you can submit the fixture(s) for the old model (I would say 2 separate fixtures)

[RODOLFO]

Update Stage Color 300 Model C61011

http://www.claypaky.it/media/documents/ ... ure_FR.pdf